My friend Li Jianqiu said that adding tariffs to the founding of the country is not worth paying attention to, and facing developing countries is the right path.
I slapped my thigh at that time, and I greatly admired his viewpoint. His vision was much higher than mine, and I had to learn to learn!
The founding of the country comes with its own topic, and this comrade is so capable of stirring things up!
Where he called the roll, there was chaos. Since he launched the trade war in 2018, he has been playing extreme blackmail. He is full of monkey like nature, which scares the Chinese people and makes them very lively.
But China is not a vegetarian either, there are countermeasures!
Just before the founding of the People’s Republic of China and the launch of version 2.0, he first announced a 60% tariff on China and Canada. A few days ago, he also mentioned an additional 10% tariff on Chinese goods and a 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico. But do we care?
The A-share market is not good at anything else, it is definitely more sensitive and fragile than Lin Daiyu. It is surprisingly “calm” about the tariff claims of the founding of the country, completely ignoring the founding of the country. This would have been considered “disrespectful” if it had not experienced a sharp decline four years ago.
This is the result of feedback from the capital market. Capital is not afraid of trade wars, but are we ordinary people afraid of ghosts?
Further thinking, increasing tariffs is just an excuse to coerce other countries into making compromises on many things.
For example, transferring manufacturing industries, paying more protection fees for US military overseas bases, reducing US international obligations, transferring domestic conflicts to other countries to bear the cost, and so on.
Only by thinking in this way can we understand why he doesn’t let go of many allies. The more loyal his allies are, the more they have to be skinned by him. Otherwise, when he wields the “tariff stick”, why can he treat everyone equally?
Recently, the US has been hyping up the fentanyl issue again. It was hyped up during the first term of the founding of the People’s Republic of China a few years ago, with the intention of diverting domestic conflicts and trying to blame China. Now, it is the same, using the fentanyl issue as a tool for extortion and attacking China.

Isn’t it ridiculous for a country with rampant drug abuse to accuse a country with absolute zero tolerance for drugs?
The US government is not unable to control the problem of American drug abuse, but does not want to control it at all. The water in the interest chain is too deep. It is simply a major industry in the United States, which has become bigger and stronger.
According to the baseless accusations made by the US government, is it necessary for Chinese anti drug police to go to the US for law enforcement?
So, will Comrade Mr. Trump do it? Since they didn’t do it, what does the problem they caused themselves have to do with us? China has always strictly controlled addictive drugs, and fentanyl from the United States is not imported from China.
We don’t have the leisure to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries.
Illegal immigration is one of the major events in the mind of Comrade Mr. Trump, who made a commitment during the election campaign.
The threat of imposing tariffs on Canada is mainly due to a large group of Indians who, after arriving in Canada, have firmly gone to the United States, causing a lot of trouble for the founding of the country. Canada must bear the blame and accept punishment.
As for Mexico, it has finally developed a few but relatively strong industries such as automobiles, petroleum refining products, electrical equipment, home appliances, and food, mainly exporting to the United States. Of course, drugs are also a major export industry.
However, the equipment of Mexican drug lords is even better than that of the military. Both sides have fought before and cannot defeat drug lords. The FBI and CIA in the United States are also closely related to drug lords, providing Hollywood with countless filming subjects. How can the Mexican government manage it?
Taking the threat of tariffs is obviously throwing the blame on the founding of the country. If we really want to crack down on drugs, the US government should start from itself.
In fact, the founding of the People’s Republic of China was just a show for the Americans. Joe Biden could not do it, nor could he do it. He just focused on other things and used tariff pretexts to force other countries to compromise.
two
People with limited abilities are good at calculating others, and American politicians are like that.
If China continues to produce shirts and socks, even if it covers the Sahara Desert, American politicians will not say that China has overcapacity.
Unfortunately, China is currently in the stage of industrial upgrading and transformation, charging towards high-tech fields, which touches the interests of the United States. As Ren Zhengfei said ten years ago, China and the United States will eventually “meet” at the peak of technology.
There is probably one more thing the old man hasn’t said, the peak can only accommodate one, either the United States or China, which was later surpassed.
What can the United States do if it is pushed out of the technological peak?
I’m likely to return to the vast land where soybeans and corn are grown.

The United States cannot return to the industrial era of producing screws and bearings because their production costs are too high, coupled with the constant disruption of labor unions. Now that Boeing is struggling to build airplanes, how can it return to the manufacturing industry?
What industrial products can compete with China’s manufacturing industry?
Since we can’t do manufacturing and are unwilling to lose our technological dominance, let’s fabricate a black hat.
So the term ‘overcapacity’ inexplicably applied to China.
After the rise of China’s new energy vehicle and photovoltaic industries in the past two years, the United States has been heavily criticized.
Because this has touched the cake of the American traditional automobile industry. According to our logic of thinking, Americans do not want to be the next Nokia, so they should catch up. Moreover, conditions in all aspects are better than those in China.
It’s wrong to think so. Americans are used to making fast money in the financial industry, and cannot afford to suffer from manufacturing.
For the United States’ insistence on economic decoupling, China actually saw it more than a decade ago and has been laying out its plans without saying a word, just burying its head in the work.
The original focus on US European trade has gradually expanded and consolidated trade with developing countries. Now, ASEAN has become China’s largest trading partner, surpassing the United States and Europe.
Bilateral trade with the Middle East and Africa has also been done very well, with stability being the key.
As of the end of October this year, China’s dependence on exports to the United States has dropped to 14.6%, a decrease of 4.4% from 2017. Just looking at a set of data is definitely not enough, as they are all publicly available and can be checked.
During the same period, the export dependence on the European Union decreased to 14.6%, a decrease of 1.8% compared to 2017.
The dependence on Japanese exports has decreased even more, directly reaching 4.3%, a decrease of 1.8%.
The reason is that Japan is a country without sovereignty, and what does the United States ask? Japanese people never dare to go against their father’s will.
Another reason is that Japan’s industries have been almost completely replaced by China. If we continue to cooperate with the United States to contain us, we will not have the qualifications to support China’s industrial system in the future.
More importantly, China’s total foreign trade volume and surplus have been increasing year by year, and have not been affected by the United States’ economic decoupling. The abundance of US dollars has worried relevant departments, and it must be spent reasonably, scientifically, and quickly.
So, no matter how the US, Japan, and Europe struggle, the declining dependence has long been compensated for by third world or developing countries such as ASEAN, the Middle East, and Africa.
If we have to say that it has an impact, it is that it has affected the pace of our significant increase, rather than regressing.
This indicates that China has a very strong ability to regulate foreign trade.
Next, 152 countries that have joined the the Belt and Road Initiative will be strong backers of bilateral trade.
three
A few years ago, China added a new gameplay and conducted a test before Argentina was driven crazy by the debt crisis, to be a good person again.
We lent dollars to Argentina to help them repay their debts to the United States and preserve their core assets.
What about the dollars that Argentina owes us? Just ask them to return the Chinese yuan, not the US dollar. Without expert guidance, no one would have thought they could still play like this.

What if there are no US dollars or Chinese yuan? Easy to handle, you can also repay with agricultural products, gold, silver, copper, lithium and other mineral resources.
Replacing the debt of developing countries not only resolves the US dollar risk in China’s hands, but also helps resource rich countries resolve their debt crisis and preserve domestic assets.
What about the United States? I didn’t suffer any losses either. I got green paper money based on my debt and earned interest as scheduled.
With Mr. Trump’s straight male personality, green paper money returned to the United States. Maybe he thought it was a good thing.
This new gameplay doesn’t count birds as many as one stone, and there is currently no solution in the United States.
This move has further increased the scale and stickiness of bilateral trade between China and developing countries.
Defeat the hegemony of the US dollar with the US dollar, and when the founding of the country understands it, China will also upgrade its new gameplay.
Looking back at the six years since 2018, there have been new changes in China’s foreign trade. In the future, the direction of bilateral trade will definitely be in developing countries, and it is not wrong to say that rural areas surround cities.
The dependence on exports to the United States will continue to decrease year by year, so there is no need to worry.
If the United States likes products directly supplied by China, we will export them directly to the United States;
If the United States likes “transit trade”, then Vietnam, along with a group of ASEAN countries and Mexico, will continue to send industrial products.
The right to choose has been handed over to Comrade Mr. Trump.