
It still makes people sigh, she is slandering China again.
Who?
Former German female trampoline athlete, now German Foreign Minister Belberg.
According to reports from German media, some European politicians have recently cited so-called “intelligence” claiming that China has a factory producing drones, which are being transported to Russia for use in the Ukraine conflict.
Bellberg got excited and declared, “This must and will have consequences
What consequences?
Sharpen the knife and impose sanctions on China.
Evidence?
There is no evidence, only so-called intelligence.
According to media reports, Europeans also acknowledge that before taking action, three things must be confirmed: 1. Verify whether Chinese factories are truly producing drones for Russia; 2. Has the drone been released from the warehouse; 3. The extent to which the Chinese authorities are aware of this matter.
The German female foreign minister couldn’t hold back and started shouting, even though she didn’t have a single stroke of her BaZi.
I saw at the press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on November 18th that there was such a dialogue.
Helsinki News, Finland: European intelligence agencies claim to have obtained information about Sino Russian cooperation in the production of military drones. Are these drones used in the conflict in Ukraine? What is China’s position on this?
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian: China has responded to similar issues multiple times. I would like to reiterate here that China has always adhered to an objective and fair position on the issue of the Ukrainian crisis, actively urged peace talks, and formed a sharp contrast with some countries’ practices of applying double standards and pouring oil into the Ukrainian crisis. China has always taken a cautious and responsible attitude towards military exports, never providing lethal weapons to parties involved in conflicts, and strictly controlling military and dual-use drones in accordance with laws and regulations. I hope that relevant countries and individuals will not make unfounded speculations, slander and smear China without factual basis.
what do you mean?
The meaning couldn’t be clearer.
- On the issue of the Ukrainian crisis, we actively promote peace talks, but what about some countries? Double standards, pouring oil over fire.
- We have never provided lethal weapons to parties involved in conflicts, and military and dual-use drones are strictly controlled.
- The so-called intelligence has no factual basis at all, it is groundless speculation, slander and smearing, and it is repeated over and over again.
Especially Lin Jian’s statement that ‘China has responded to similar issues multiple times’, there is a bit of helplessness.
Some Western politicians and media always like to make big news, but they always make mistakes.
But Lin Jian’s “double standards” are what these speculators are best at.
Not to mention anything else, recently the United States, the United Kingdom, and France agreed to allow Ukraine to use the long-range missiles they provided to attack Russia. According to the Associated Press, this marks a “significant change” in relevant policies.
Germany is under a lot of pressure.
After all, although the voices of Britain and France are loud in assisting Ukraine, they actually provide more aid to Germany. Previously, Germany’s attitude was that in providing long-range missiles, the United States would agree to loosen its stance before Germany would loosen its stance.
Unexpectedly, Joe Biden, who was about to step down, suddenly relented. Then Britain and France followed suit.
What about the Germans?
German Chancellor Scholz is still insisting.
At the G20 summit, he made it clear that Germany will not provide Ukraine with the Taurus long-range cruise missile because we have a “clear idea” that “Germany must make every effort to ensure that the war does not escalate and that we ourselves cannot become a belligerent”.
Scholz is very clear that Germany is the biggest victim of the Ukrainian crisis. So, he is also adjusting his countermeasures, and recently, for the first time, he took the initiative to call Putin.
In fact, former Russian President Medvedev criticized European politicians for following the sudden release of water by the United States, stating that they were “trying to bring the war to their European homeland”.
Musk, who has a close relationship with Donald Trump, said on social media: “The problem is that Russia will take reciprocal revenge.” Previously, he also agreed with the view that “liberals like war”.
Donald Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr., said more frankly that the American arms dealer wanted to launch the Third World War before his father came to power.
The German Chancellor is very cautious, but the German female Foreign Minister is not convinced.
Belberg, who was born in the Green Party, praised Joe Biden’s release of water and thought that Germany should do the same: “Ukraine’s self-defense action should now also have the ability to destroy Russian missile launch bases, which is in line with international law.”
On the one hand, it advocates giving the green light, not only providing lethal weapons, but now it wants to provide long-range missiles; On the other hand, the unfounded drones are heavily criticized and brought to the forefront.
This is not a double standard, so what is it?
This is not an international joke, so what is it?
Finally, what do you think?
During the business trip, I won’t say much about it. It’s difficult to change someone, and changing a female politician who likes to wear colored glasses is even more difficult than reaching the sky.
As for Bell Burke, I remember in April last year, she put forward the statement that Germany is no longer naive towards China.
When did Germany become naive about China?
But Bellberg thinks Germany is naive.
Many times, German Chancellor Scholz wants to go east, but she always insists on going west, leaving the whole world stunned. Who really represents Germany?
Many times during his travels, Scholz traveled alone and did not want to bring Bell Burke with him. Because taking her along is adding chaos and trouble to oneself.
However, as the German Foreign Minister, Belberg is still in charge of diplomacy, and some of her words and actions have had a negative impact on Sino German relations.
I have seen some German lawmakers criticize that the female foreign minister is always playing with fire, and that the German government has established good relations with China after “50 years of effort,” while “you are trampling on everything they have built.
But even for such people, last year when Bell Burke visited China, China still treated him with courtesy.
According to the reports at that time, Chinese officials accompanied her and told her that the world is becoming increasingly noisy, fanatical, and prone to extremism. However, both the Chinese and German nations are known for their calm and rational thinking, and have produced great sages and philosophers. China has Laozi and Confucius, while Germany has Kant and Hegel. In this turbulent world, what contributions can China and Germany make to world peace, tranquility, and human development and progress?
He continued, ‘I believe that it is still necessary for our two nations, our politicians and diplomats, to remain calm and rational. The mistakes of history cannot be repeated, and the tragedies of history cannot be repeated.’
Chinese officials also told Bellberg that China had supported Germany’s reunification and hoped and believed that Germany would also support China’s peaceful reunification.
Belbock listened in a daze.
However, after hearing about returning to China, we should do what we want, which still gives Scholtz a headache, still makes Germans helpless, and still makes Chinese people speechless.
Alas, you can never wake up someone pretending to be asleep.