Many people have heard of the outcome of gender opposition, male dominance, and the collapse of women’s rights in Japan, but this description is actually not very accurate, let alone explaining the socio-economic reasons behind it.
The gender opposition in Japan can be traced back to the Heisei era thirty years ago.
Many people have this question: why do women in Japan and South Korea have such a low status, but there is no feminist movement?
The answer is: Yes!
In the 1980s, the Japanese economy had a round of vigorous development before the foam burst.
With the comprehensive improvement of economic income, employment environment, etc., the feminist movement in Japan is also very high. How high has it reached? At that time, Japanese women believed that a woman should have four boyfriends: a errand boy, a single man, a gift boy, and a real life.
At that time, when inviting women to dinner, they had to go to high-end restaurants priced at 50000 yen or more, as well as to upscale hotels and receive expensive jewelry as gifts.
I am an independent and outstanding woman in the new era. If you want to pursue me, you must show sincerity. Even a proprietary term has emerged to refer to this phenomenon – love capitalism.
Afterwards, with economic development, it further developed into the “Heisei New Women”.
The difference between Heisei new women and romantic capitalism is that they don’t even want love anymore.
Heisei’s new woman advocates not getting married and ignoring men. We women are beautiful and should help each other, while men are all “stinky men”. We women should pursue “freedom” and encourage women to get married. Is that a conspiracy of men to exploit us women through marriage.
Simply put, you can understand love capitalism as the wave of feminism that demands dowries, the Heisei New Women as anti dowries, and the wave of feminism that emphasizes workplace rights at the societal level.
However, despite differences, the overall consensus is to jointly condemn male offenders in any case, oppose sexual harassment, and oppose workplace discrimination.
It seems that the development of Heisei new women is not very good, right?
But the problem is that gradually, Japanese feminism began to expand, or in other words, after one group gained a sense of superiority over another, it often led to discrimination and opposition.
I am a noble Heisei new woman, and you are an ordinary Japanese man. Where do you have the qualifications to stand with me?

If a man has any physical contact with a woman, he will be charged with rape and molestation. On the subway, if a man touches a woman for any reason, he will be called a fool. If a leader sends an email to a female subordinate, it is workplace sexual harassment. Even if you glance at my office colleagues, I can understand that you have ulterior motives towards me
Unconsciously, Japanese women’s rights have begun to turn to using different methods to criticize men, and all men are following this twisted path. Or in other words, compared to the previous academic and speculative feminist movement, this kind of voice that directly curses men is easier to spread and more easily understood by everyone.
——Whoever has a cheaper ticket to heaven will have more followers.
Various expansions and even defamation cases were also part of the daily public opinion at that time.
That’s also why the invention of women only carriages didn’t first appear in countries like the Middle East, but in Japan. At that time, it was believed that direct physical isolation could effectively solve these problems. They are all physically isolated, so women don’t have to worry about being a fool, and men don’t have to worry about social death. I asked if you are perfect?
But the problem is that the foam era has ended and the lost 20 years have come.
Many articles come to the conclusion that Japanese men lie flat and their demand for women’s rights collapses directly after losing the ability to buy a single person. But in fact, the changes in social trends are not so simple. Behind social phenomena, the essence is still the changes in the economy and industries.
The development of women’s rights in Japan is essentially the urbanization dividend brought about by Japan’s economic development, and Japanese companies at that time were willing to pay a high premium. Male college graduates are directly given high salaries, and female college graduates are also given high salaries.
Only by understanding this can you fully comprehend why the lost 20 years ended the feminist movement in Japan, as the economic environment has changed.
In the foam era, Japanese enterprises can offer a large number of high priced offers, but with the foam bursting, they have entered the crash era. All kinds of enterprises have to worry about bankruptcy survival. How dare they open up recruitment?
In 1991, the ratio of the number of applicants to the final number of admissions by Japanese companies was 2.86 (the number of applicants in Japan can be understood as our offer, the letter of intent to sign the contract).
That is to say, as soon as college graduates graduate, there are 2.86 company positions waiting for them. In 2000, this data fell to 0.99, which means that there must be 1% of unemployed people who cannot find a job.
Considering that top talents often receive offers from multiple companies, you can roughly feel the actual number of unemployed people.

Meanwhile, Japanese companies have also reached their end.

Around 90 years ago, there were 150 Japanese companies on the Fortune Global 500 list, but by 2015, only 54 Japanese companies had made it onto the list.

Economic stagnation, business closures, layoffs, and job losses can be summed up as insufficient distribution of the cake, which naturally leads to internal competition among all employees. At this point, any attempt at political correctness loses its meaning, and the workplace becomes a battle of natural selection.

In the all-out battle royale, Japanese women were the first to be eliminated.
Regardless of political correctness, anyone should understand that in an environment where there are no rules or constraints, it is difficult for women to get involved in a situation where men do not get married or fall in love without risking their lives. So I have said more than once that if you truly want to protect women’s employment, what you need to do is not just talk about it, but must firmly oppose 996, because if a company exhausts its workload and doesn’t take a day off every month, you need to understand which group it is actually driving out.
In addition, many people say that the low employment rate of Japanese women is due to Japan’s machismo, which forces women to return to the family. This understanding is also superficial, and the core essence is the internal competition caused by the economic downturn, with a large number of women being eliminated, which has led to the rise of traditional housewives.
According to survey results, less than 16% of men in all age groups hope their wives become housewives after marriage, and more than half of them choose to “respect their wives’ decisions”.

Simply put, life is tough, and any tradition or ideology is fake. Isn’t it good to make money with dual employment? Do you really think Japanese men can’t handle this?

Tradition is not very persuasive when it comes to eating. But the collapse of the foam was far beyond imagination. After women were out of the game, the cake was still not divided enough. So, the less competitive part of the male population was also eliminated, which is the familiar group of lying flat tribe.

In summary, the cake rapidly shrank, and except for a small number of roll kings, the rest were all eliminated.
The change of this era is the reason for the collapse of women’s rights in Japan.
The part of young men who are lying flat, with a collapsed heart, no resources, and no motivation to pursue women – “Marriage is squeezing women? I agree too much, so in order not to squeeze women, I choose not to get married.
As for workplace discrimination? Okay, in order not to cause trouble for everyone, I won’t be working. Not in love, not married, not working, lying at home with salted fish, Minasan, whatever you say is what you want.
After the radicalization of Japanese feminism, a big problem is that they have abandoned the initial goal of improving women’s self-esteem and instead started to attack men, hoping that men would give up benefits. Therefore, almost all demands are based on male cooperation. I think you should respect women, I think you should learn empathy, and I think a normal man should learn to improve himself by giving gifts.
(You read it right, these were the requests made by Japanese women back then)
The answer given by the lying down tribe is “No, no, no, I’m not a normal male, I’m just a waste. OK, can I go back and lie down after scolding
Faced with an opponent who has completely collapsed, even lying flat in their own lives, you will find that any argument loses its effectiveness.
So, what about the men who won the competition? They can’t just mess it up, can they.
They said, no no, no, I’m not a normal male either. It took me eighteen years to finally sit on the rooftop of Ginza, Tokyo and have coffee. Can you make a request for me? Could you please clarify the situation? It’s me who has the right to make a request now. Let’s move on to the next one.
According to a survey conducted by the Meiji Yasuda Institute of Life and Welfare in 2016, only 38.7% of men hoped to get married, while women accounted for 59%.
A large number of men lie flat, and the number of men who do not lie is rare. After a round of competition in the workplace, women find that the supply and demand relationship in the marriage and love market is also inverted.
In the end, the marriage requirements for Japanese women changed from the three highs of high income, high education, and tall stature in the past to what we see today as having a job without domestic violence.
This phenomenon actually has a highly similar trend in China, such as Beijing.

But on the male side, it is only an external factor, and more importantly, the collapse of the female basic plate.

As mentioned before, the foundation of Japanese feminism is the new urban female class that enters big cities and has economic freedom, which used to be a group with common demands. But after the economic downturn, this group was actually torn apart. Some women must form families with men to combat economic risks, and naturally cannot support the voice of feminism anymore. Especially the “Heisei New Women” who oppose marriage.
——I don’t want to go back to go home. I need to economize with my husband to fight against the high prices and rents in Tokyo. It’s not good that you are still married. Can I live on principle?
During the economic upturn, it is difficult for everyone to recognize the class contradiction. At this time, of course, it is “Hello my sisters, but once the turning point appears, in front of the heavy reality, everyone immediately realizes that” sisters “are not the same class.

On the other hand, some young women are becoming more extreme and hostile towards men, believing that feminism is not radical enough. They are a generation that experienced rapid development during their student years, and their understanding from a young age is that the Japanese economy is developing rapidly, and high paying positions can be easily selected. However, during graduation, they suddenly encountered a turning point, and their original expectations collapsed instantly. The society is so cruel, and many people attribute the reason to the oppression of male society. “It’s not that I can’t beat others, but the oppression of male society.

So, what about the women who survived the brutal escape in the workplace? As the backbone, they must always shoulder the banner of Japanese feminism, right?
The answer is exactly the opposite, they are more clearly opposed to women’s rights.
Why? Because they found that the feminist movement actually increased their workplace costs. In the previous era of expansion, many companies adopted an extreme one size fits all attitude.
Yes, yes, I completely agree with what everyone is saying. Sending separate emails to female subordinates by superiors is sexual harassment. In the future, please do not send separate emails to female subordinates
In the era of expansion, if you are not so extreme, you will be attacked, but this actually increases the communication cost and trust crisis for female employees. In the era of collapse, this difference may become a reason for being laid off.
So at this point, the demand of many working women is to oppose feminism and any voices that distinguish themselves from men and make them special. Why should I go out of my way when I can win the game openly?
The trend of this group of women has returned to the women’s thinking of the Chanel era, shifting from emphasizing women’s rights to emphasizing gender equality. Men can wear pants to work, and I can also wear pants to work. I firmly oppose the establishment of any women only carriages or special treatment measures for me, as it treats me as a weak person.
But at this point, it is already too late to step on the brakes, and the awareness of high workplace costs for women has been established. A large number of women have been expelled from the workplace or can only serve as the lowest level temporary workers.
So, all social trends are essentially a reflection of the economy. Any ideology ultimately needs to provide a material answer.
The decoupling and lying flat of Japanese men, or breaking free from the shackles of marriage and love and becoming the ultimate refined egoist.
Japanese women have found that they have been following the women’s rights movement for a long time without gaining actual productivity or improving their employment competitiveness. The only thing they have done is to lead everyone to criticize men. However, after so many years of scolding, the other party has not changed, either lying flat or opposing each other. They have really suffered losses in their workplace and marriage. Why am I still following you?
The once glorious Japanese feminism has dissipated here.
Some people evaluate Japanese feminism in this way. In fact, Japanese feminism is successful, but it is not the women who laugh until the end. It is the group of men who have absorbed feminist ideas – the feminist trend broke the shackles of marriage and tradition, and some men also benefited greatly. They quickly learned the essence of its ideas, that they are not responsible if they don’t get married. They invest all their time, energy, and money in themselves to package themselves, becoming an “independent woman” who is even more feminist than feminism. However, they also have the qualities of male struggle and endurance, and can be called the ultimate invincible refined egoist. They became the one who laughed until the end in this battle royale.
So, what about South Korea?
The gender imbalance in South Korea is even more severe than in Japan. If Japan relies on Buddhism to lay flat and overcome hardness with softness, then South Korea is a gender war of political correctness against bombing.
At the Tokyo Olympics, many people may remember a news story: the female archer who won the gold medal was accused of feminism due to her short hair and was demanded to return her gold medal by cyberbullying.

Many people find it unbelievable that a South Korean man could be so obsessed with cyberbullying the Olympic champion who brought glory to his country?
But if you pay attention to your speech, you will find a more interesting thing, the reason why male netizens engage in online bullying is: ‘She is a feminist’; And all those who defend her point of view is: ‘She is not a feminist.’. Having short hair is freedom, but it doesn’t mean she’s a feminist. There’s no evidence to prove that she’s a feminist, “instead of” What’s wrong with feminism? Why can’t it be feminism

Did you notice? Regardless of gender, they no longer debate whether women’s rights are good or not, but rather whether they are women’s rights.

Why is that? Why has feminism become such an unpopular term in Korea?
The answer also starts from more than ten years ago.
Like Japan, both men and women in South Korea have experienced beautiful times with a full moon.
With the development of economy and urbanization, the trend of fashion, avant-garde, and free love has been widely spread among young people. At the beginning of the century, young men and women in the four Asian Tigers of Korea also had a common aspiration for beauty.

Korean feminism also emerged at this time, and their demands were also refined and independent women’s ideas, advocating individualism and cutting away from past traditions. And similarly, Korean feminism once received support from the majority of people, regardless of gender.
However, the same scenario as that of Japan has emerged. Since the new century, the rise of China has constantly challenged South Korea’s pillar industries, and the internal volume has emerged in large numbers. The economic crisis in 2008 has made it even worse. With the unemployment rate exploding, the internal volume has begun to emerge in large numbers.

You should be able to guess the plot later. In the internal competition battle royale, Korean men and women began to fight each other, and like Japan, Korean women also lost in the battle royale.
But what is even more serious than Japan is that in South Korea, extremist feminism has gained the upper hand, and organizations such as Megalia have emerged.
PS: This is actually not accidental. The more serious problems of social capital tycoons in South Korea will inevitably lead to this outcome. Before Megalia appeared, the conflict between men and women in South Korea was already very serious.
Megalia is a radical feminist organization that emerged in 2015. At first, they gathered together to oppose sexual harassment, employment discrimination, and make various derogatory remarks about men. However, they later became increasingly radical – promoting propaganda campaigns for abortion of male infants, insisting on the complete gender extermination of South Korean men, promoting stabbing unfamiliar men with knives on the streets, and taking selfies with knives on their sleeping fathers’ necks.
Abortion of a male infant, cursing at the ST of the aborted male infant: “Goodbye! Go to hell! I have stopped another criminal who oppresses women in the future
Even national heroes have been attacked due to their male identity.
It involves a large number of bloody and violent vocabulary and images. If you post this article, it won’t pass. I suggest you search for it yourself.
By the way, that finger gesture is their logo.

And alongside this logo, there is a variant symbol of the Nazi swastika flag.

You now know why Korean netizens are staring at this symbol and not releasing it.
In a sense, in terms of the degree of radicalism, Korean feminism is the most radical in the world, unmatched by China, Japan, Europe, and America. All the gender opposition rhetoric and related cases you saw today are not a problem in Korea.
But the problem is that the direction of radical feminism in South Korea has made the same mistake, as their power has not been directed towards capitalists, but towards men who are also part of the proletariat.
There is a ready-made capitalist who refuses to fight and aims to attack the fictional ‘patriarchal’ void, unleashing AOE on ordinary men. The result is naturally that South Korean men are starting to counterattack, and the more they fight, the more radical they become.
Capital bullies you, tycoons bully you, engage in gender discrimination and workplace harassment, then you should attack the tycoons and capitalists! What’s the point of scolding us male workers every day if you don’t curse capitalists? Why should I pay for the mistakes of capitalists?
And their thinking is also more extreme than Japan’s lying flat flow, which is to defeat magic with magic and use political correctness to counter the bombardment.
What does that mean?
A photo shows that there are more men than women. Korean feminism says this is discrimination against women and oppression of women by society.
The general idea is to explain the specific situation without discriminating against women, right. But the male dominated mindset in South Korea is:
That’s right, this is discrimination against women. Your website should take down all of them and apologize
But if the pictures you bring up show more women than men, then it’s discrimination against men
Come on, for each photo, let’s count them one by one. If the number of men and women is different, your website will be in trouble
……
Simply put, to fight political correctness with political correctness, if you want fairness, I will give you fairness, and it will be ten thousand times more fair than you think. There must be a bit of unfairness, which is discrimination. Let’s see who can’t bear it first.
Men and women are equal. Okay, I completely agree, so if you dare to say that men should pay a little more for meals, then you are engaging in discrimination.
Variety shows cannot make jokes about women, okay, no problem. So, variety shows cannot make jokes about men, right? You wouldn’t oppose gender equality, would you?
And when both parties hold magnifying glasses to watch variety shows, causing the variety show creators to become autistic, women are surprised to find that this model is losing itself.
Why? Due to the politically correct atmosphere, variety shows are basically impossible to do, and women find that there is less content they can watch. And what about men? Men never watch variety shows.
For example, women accuse men of texting and harassing, saying that Korean men are really disgusting. Okay, all members of the opposite sex are not allowed to send text messages to each other.
This gives rise to the legendary crime of three acts of courtship~
(You read it right, there are really such magical regulations, and in this one, the standards for courtship are very broad~even invitations to meet can be counted)

Then something interesting happened. At first, women also believed that the beneficiaries of this regulation were women, so both sides worked together to promote its implementation. But soon more and more women realized that the beneficiaries of this regulation were men, because the regulation was equivalent to directly killing the existence space of licking dogs, and women lost the romance and bargaining space in love.
Simply put, South Korea has also encountered a situation similar to ours, where men are unwilling to bow down and chase after women. The emergence of this regulation has given men an excuse to leave immediately once rejected.
There are still questions in China such as “Why do boys nowadays stop chasing halfway?” and “Is it considered a scumbag if a boy who has been chasing me for a long time suddenly goes after someone else?

South Korea definitely won’t have this question, it’s just a grocery shopping model.
Chasing girls? What are you chasing after? If you come up, you won’t hit me. If you don’t agree, you can come down directly.
Don’t ask, asking means I respect women and would never commit a crime, so please give me a number within three times.
So many women began to oppose it, thinking that three times is too few, losing the romance of love, and unable to judge the other person’s sincerity. But the South Korean man immediately retorted, ‘Do you object? Have you ever thought about the feelings of women being harassed?’
So a magical scene appeared, where South Korean men seized the high ground of political correctness, while women in turn supported giving men more opportunities.
This strategy also directly tore apart Korean women, because regardless of the level of men, they all hope to save some trouble in pursuing girls, and everyone can save trouble without kneeling or licking.
But for women, the problem for top-level women is being harassed and invited every day, and they can’t keep up, while the problem for ordinary women is that men are not sincere and proactive enough, and there are fundamental differences between the two sides on this issue.
South Korean men discovered that the overall interests of men in marriage and love were so easily aligned, so they immediately took advantage of the situation and chased after them.
At that time, the focus of women’s rights in South Korea was also on marriage, such as accusing marriage of oppressing women and criticizing the cooling off period for divorce. Yes, South Korea also has a cooling off period for divorce, but they call it the “divorce contemplation period”.
Then, interestingly, the anti aggression strategy of Korean men’s rights is——
You actually want to improve this, do you really want to get married
Marriage is the exploitation of women. Well said, I completely agree, so why do you always think about improving this to trap women
Simply put, South Korean men have turned this topic into a fierce competition to see who doesn’t want to get married the most.
This time, Korean women believe they have definitely won.
Because everyone’s understanding has always been that women have a low demand for marriage, and men are more eager to get married, that’s why there is a saying that men should give in in love, or in other words, they need to give up benefits.
But when the curtain was finally lifted, the women were surprised to find that they had lost again, and a large number of Korean men were actually the ones who didn’t want to get married.
Why is that?
In fact, as long as you look at the case of Japan just now and the economic logic behind it, you can fully understand the situation in South Korea.
The economic foundation determines the superstructure, and this principle is universally applicable.
Like Japan, in an environment of gender opposition during an economic downturn, South Korean men suddenly realize that they are the stronger. Being single and not getting married is more advantageous for oneself, and the only reason for getting married at this time is the traditional pressure from parents. Feminism, on the other hand, has precisely disrupted traditional order and responsibility constraints.
When this layer of curtain was pulled down, the situation immediately slid towards the direction of the extremely eerie social Darwinism.
Korean feminism accuses men of not being gentle and considerate enough, and Korean men immediately say, ‘Break up quickly! Don’t be oppressed!’; South Korean feminism accuses men of profiting from marriage, and South Korean men immediately say ‘divorce quickly! Don’t be oppressed’
When South Korean men really threw away their masks and said that everyone should completely separate and live separately, South Korean women found that almost all of their foothold, topic points, and discussion space had been eliminated.
You picked a bunch of thorns for marriage, told the other party to change these things or else they would never get married, and then the other party replied, ‘Why do you think I want to get married?’
Many people cannot understand why South Korean men and women are so obsessed and extreme. In fact, they have not understood the situation. They are actually engaged in a power struggle involving discourse.
In this extreme situation where both parties are at a loss, whoever doesn’t want to get married the more will have the confidence to make demands. Whoever really needs marriage more, who really needs each other’s cooperation more, who can’t bear it faster, and who loses.
Then, Korean feminism discovered that the Joker was actually herself.
The economic foundation determines the superstructure, and Korean women’s rights want to fight, but the female group behind them can no longer sustain it.
The demonized gender opposition in South Korea has shattered the alliance between young men and women, and South Korean men have found that they can achieve a single win with capital.
There are more women in the workplace, representing excellent women and weak men, so it is necessary to criticize men; The scarcity of women in the workplace represents the oppression of women by male society, and it is even more important to criticize men. Since we are all going to be criticized, why don’t we choose the latter? This way, we will have more positions.
When the other party accuses you of gender oppression no matter what, it’s best for you to truly engage in gender oppression “- Under this mindset, South Korean men directly emulate Japanese finalists and initiate the policy of not getting married or in love Infinite involution mode.
Korean women are being rolled up and unable to play anymore

But the problem is, if limited to this, it cannot be called a gender war in South Korea, and the more serious ones are still ahead.
In 2018, a 39 year old business owner was accused of sexually harassing a woman while eating at a Korean restaurant. Apart from the victim’s testimony, the incident lacked other evidence, but the man was ultimately sentenced to six months in prison. This incident can be considered as a complete provocation of the South Korean male community’s opposition to women’s rights.
Later, when the polling agency Reakmater conducted a survey, it was found that 76% of men in their 20s in South Korea opposed feminism, and 66% of men in their 30s opposed it. Among all young men in South Korea, 58.6% oppose feminism, with extreme opposition reaching as high as 25.9%.
A survey by the Korea Women’s Development Institute shows that over 65% of young South Korean men say they equate feminism with “hatred towards men”. Even 56.5% of people said that if their girlfriend was a feminist, they would immediately break up with her.
They believe that feminism is no longer simply advocating gender equality, but has evolved into a form of gender discrimination and hatred. This trend became increasingly evident after the outbreak of the MeToo movement.
Note that this is not an extreme male dominated view in South Korea, but rather a common view among male passersby.
That is to say, you may think that Korean male dominance is very intimidating, but the reality is that the more they fight, the stronger they become, and the larger their group becomes. Then, a phenomenon that caught everyone’s eye off appeared: men aged 20-30 went to vote for conservatives.
In the April 2021 Seoul mayoral by election, 72.5% of young men voted for conservatives, even higher than male voters aged 60 and above. In 2017, 90% of this group supported liberals.
Many people may not understand what this means. Simply put, regardless of any country, men in the age group of 20-30, young, without family pressure or life pressure, should be the most avant-garde and innovative force in society, the recipients and backbone of various new technologies, products, and trends. Then, this core cornerstone group of the left not only did not vote for the left, but also turned to the conservatives in the opposite direction, and was even more completely conservative than the 60 year old. The direct result was an explosion of liberals, and conservatives took off.
Why?
Because conservatives are anti feminist!
Conservative Li Junxi’s famous statement is that “radical feminism is as toxic as terrorism
Do you think he should resign and step down after saying this? Should we apologize to women?
No, none of them.
Relying on his firm anti feminist stance, he was elected as a party representative without financial support, organizational factional support, or regional support, with a support rate of 43.82%, becoming the youngest major political party leader in South Korea after democratization (36 years old).
They are currently the largest opposition party.

On the other hand, Moon Jae-in, the former president, claimed to be a feminist. In the 2017 election, he promised to make half of his cabinet members female (does the EU now do this?).
But the problem is that he did not live up to his previous promise, and the more fatal issue is that he remained silent when his subordinates were metoo, which directly led to him losing the support of female voters.
The final result is that the support rate of the opposition parties overwhelms Moon Jae-in – Seoul mayoral election: the National Power Party 57.5% vs the Common Democratic Party 39.2%.
So, compared to other countries where gender opposition is smaller, this is the real gender war in South Korea.
Who wouldn’t say a word of admiration for being able to persuade a 20-year-old young person to go and apply for insurance.
After understanding these, you may understand why Korean feminism ultimately collapsed and became a term that everyone should avoid.
As a political ideology, they never figured out what their demands were and where the boundaries were from beginning to end? Have you ever thought about who your friends are and who your enemies are?
To achieve workplace fairness and oppose workplace discrimination, an alliance should be established to target capitalists, but they are targeting other working-class men;
If we oppose sexual harassment, we should emphasize order towards the criminals, but they are targeting all Korean men with artillery fire, saying that ‘all Korean men are XX criminals’;
……
Since Wen supports women, she should stand up for them, rather than saying that if women’s rights are not absolute, then they are absolutely not women’s rights.
Without considering either the economic foundation or the current state of productivity, it all depends on who shouts loudly and becomes more radical. Whoever becomes radical will eventually become a castle in the air.
In this competition, South Korean men are more mature and resolute in their execution, first and foremost targeting the core demands of extreme feminist groups from beginning to end, using magic to seize the high ground of political correctness.
A large number of topics related to women’s rights in South Korea may seem to oppose marriage, but in essence, it is about raising prices and how to optimize marriage. After forming a consensus that whoever gets married is a dog, South Korean men have completely suppressed the focus of women’s rights.
Secondly, South Korean men firmly remember the principle that economic foundation is the cornerstone of everything, grasping productivity from beginning to end, and cooperating with capital to launch the ultimate internal competition. Women who are directly involved cannot play.
Finally, young men in South Korea collectively let go of their prejudices and went to vote for conservatives – interestingly, some people mentioned that young men in Europe voted for green, which is also the plot.
In any country, traditional conservative forces, capitalist forces, and male dominated ethnic groups are basically pillar forces that balance each other. However, after a chaotic crackdown on women’s rights in South Korea, these three forces surprisingly sat at the same table.
When the anti feminist united front of capital subject ethnic male conservative order, which transcends imagination, was established, the collapse of Korean feminism was already inevitable.
In terms of fundamentals, Korean women’s rights have made the same mistake as Japanese women’s rights. Apart from being able to curse men loudly, they have not been able to fight for real benefits for their own women from beginning to end. On the contrary, Korean men have gained more benefits after breaking free from traditional constraints.
After a long period of gender conflict, Korean women have found that according to the Korean feminist system, men on the other side benefit more, while women are even less favored?
Not boxing benefits men; Men benefit more from boxing. What else am I fighting?
At this point, Korean women also began to oppose feminism, or in other words, oppose this theoretical mechanism.
In fact, there are also signs of this phenomenon in China. More and more women have expressed that although the previous generation was chauvinistic, they had a sense of responsibility to earn money to support their families. Now, they are lying flat and eating soft meals without even giving AA money when they meet. They have even lost money one after another.
But like Japan, under widespread hatred and opposition, it’s already too late to hit the brakes again.
The following chart shows the dismal fertility rate and population data in South Korea:

The lesson is not far away, take it as a warning!